Home / The Firm / People / Pam Miller

Pam Miller

Paralegal

Phone:
208.274.9910
Fax:
208.232.0150
Email:
pmiller@hawleytroxell.com

Biography

Pam Miller is a paralegal in the Hawley Troxell Litigation practice group. Pam was born and raised in Eastern Idaho, graduating from Idaho State University with a degree in paralegal studies. Pam has been working in the legal field in Idaho and Wyoming since 2005 and has a diverse background in complex legal matters with both state and federal courts. She specializes in fact discovery preparation and review (including electronically stored information), deposition assistance, legal research, and drafting documents. Pam is also experienced with trial preparation, in-court assistance, and arbitration hearings as well as handling appellant matters before the Idaho Supreme Court and the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

PROFESSIONAL/COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS

Intermountain Paralegal Association, Treasurer, Vice President, 2007-2014

United Way of Eastern Idaho Board Member, 2006-2014

Idaho State University College of Technology Paralegal Studies Advisory Committee, 2006-2014

EDUCATION

Undergraduate:

Idaho State University, Paralegal Studies

Related Insights

Confounding Statutes, How Does Statutory Interpretation Work Again?

This article, originally published in the May 2026 Edition of The Advocate, explores several examples of Idaho statutes where the presence of ambiguities and confusion…

Read

From Hesitation to Implementation: A Practical Guide on Implementing AI into Your Firm

This article, originally published in the May 2026 Edition of The Advocate, explores what law firms can do to leverage AI integration with both innovation…

Read

Reconsidering Medical Liens: Insurance Billing Requirements and Statutory Constraints After DeKlotz

This article, originally published in the May 2026 Edition of The Advocate, examines the Court’s interpretation of the Idaho Patient Act (IPA), its articulation of…

Read

Interlocutory Appeal in Idaho: Is There a Better Process?

In this article, originally published in the February 2023 edition of The Advocate, Stephen Adams discusses whether there is a better system of interlocutory review…

Read