Home / Insights / Employer-Provided Spousal Benefits Face Different Requirements From State to State

Insight Employer-Provided Spousal Benefits Face Different Requirements From State to State

Idaho-based employers with employees in multiple states could be subject to significant penalties and litigation if they do not comply with the laws of each state regarding group health coverage and other benefits provided to the same-sex spouses of employees.

Such employers should review the laws of each state where they have employees to confirm that the administration of any benefits offered to spouses complies with applicable law in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Windsor requiring the federal government to recognize same-sex marriage.

Click here to read the full article on the IBR Blog.

This article first appeared in the Idaho Business Review.

Related Insights

Best Practices for Landlords in Manufactured Home Community Leasing

This blog provides an overview of Idaho law and leasing in manufactured home communities (MHCs).

Read

Are You Ready for the 2027 H-1B Cap? What Employers Need to Know Now

As employers look toward the March 2026 registration window for the Fiscal Year 2027 H-1B cap season, the H-1B landscape is undergoing one of the…

Read

New Year's Reminders & Resolutions for Defined Contribution Plan Sponsors

As we enter 2026, a few brief reminders of important issues affecting defined contributions plans (such as 401(k) plans) that require plan sponsor employers’ attention

Read

The One Big Beautiful Bill Revisited

As the commencement of the 2026 Idaho Legislative Session approaches, it's timely to review the provisions of the OBBBA and how they might affect individuals…

Read